<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anyone else Sick and Tired of the Domain Name Business?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/</link>
	<description>(Were you expecting a witty tagline?)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 05:41:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lewitzke</title>
		<link>http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lewitzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments (and bookmark), Apollia :D

I&#039;ve heard of the Network Solutions Fiascoes a little bit, but have never been directly involved with them, as I&#039;ve always just registered them through a straightforward provider (Godaddy). I wasn&#039;t going to pay 35 bucks or more just for a domain name when the content was going to be the primary focus of my website.

I also agree with you about suffering for your own incompetence. By getting rid of that grace period, as you said, domain companies won&#039;t be able to tell how marketable it is, thus the actual practice of domain squatting will be severely diminished, as they won&#039;t be able to tell as effectively.

Hopefully ICANN will do something about this :) (if they haven&#039;t already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments (and bookmark), Apollia <img src='http://www.lightningshock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of the Network Solutions Fiascoes a little bit, but have never been directly involved with them, as I&#8217;ve always just registered them through a straightforward provider (Godaddy). I wasn&#8217;t going to pay 35 bucks or more just for a domain name when the content was going to be the primary focus of my website.</p>
<p>I also agree with you about suffering for your own incompetence. By getting rid of that grace period, as you said, domain companies won&#8217;t be able to tell how marketable it is, thus the actual practice of domain squatting will be severely diminished, as they won&#8217;t be able to tell as effectively.</p>
<p>Hopefully ICANN will do something about this <img src='http://www.lightningshock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (if they haven&#8217;t already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apollia</title>
		<link>http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Apollia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightningshock.com/2008/04/04/anyone-else-sick-and-tired-of-the-domain-name-business/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Yep, I feel much the same way.  

Last January there was an uproar about how, when you do a domain name search at the Network Solutions site, they register the domain themselves for 5 days and then try to charge you $35 for it.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/10/network-solutions-using-questionable-tactic-to-sell-more-domain-names/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Network solutions Using Questionable Domain Tactics&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-steals-domain-ideas-confirmed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Network Solutions Steals Domain Ideas Confirmed&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-is-getting-better/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Network Solutions is Getting Better&lt;/a&gt;

I don&#039;t know what Network Solutions does currently, or if they finally cleaned up their act, but after hearing about the above, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll ever trust Network Solutions.

It seems one thing that made their unscrupulous practices possible was the five-day grace period for companies like Network Solutions to register a domain without paying any fees.

I read something somewhere which claimed that there are companies which take advantage of the grace period by just re-registering a domain every five days, thereby avoiding ever having to pay fees on the domain, which I guess is so common it even has a name, &quot;domain kiting&quot;.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_kiting

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting : &quot;In January 2008, ICANN announced that the exemption on transaction costs (US$ 0.25) during the five-day grace period would be abandoned, which would effectively make the practice of domain tasting not viable.&quot;

I haven&#039;t found out yet if ICANN has actually implemented that yet, though.  If they haven&#039;t already, I think they ought to just get rid of the grace period entirely - I think it would probably solve a lot of problems.

If that meant domain registration companies like Network Solutions could no longer accept credit cards due to the risk of credit card fraud, I don&#039;t really see a problem with that - it might help make the credit card companies take responsibility for their own rampant problems with fraud.  There are other ways besides credit cards to instantaneously take payments over the internet - PayPal, for one.

I say, let the credit card companies suffer the consequences of their own incompetence - maybe then they&#039;ll be motivated to improve themselves to better serve their customers, such as by implementing more effective anti-fraud measures.

I enjoy your blog. :-)

Best wishes,
Apollia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I feel much the same way.  </p>
<p>Last January there was an uproar about how, when you do a domain name search at the Network Solutions site, they register the domain themselves for 5 days and then try to charge you $35 for it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/10/network-solutions-using-questionable-tactic-to-sell-more-domain-names/" rel="nofollow">Network solutions Using Questionable Domain Tactics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-steals-domain-ideas-confirmed/" rel="nofollow">Network Solutions Steals Domain Ideas Confirmed</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-is-getting-better/" rel="nofollow">Network Solutions is Getting Better</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what Network Solutions does currently, or if they finally cleaned up their act, but after hearing about the above, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever trust Network Solutions.</p>
<p>It seems one thing that made their unscrupulous practices possible was the five-day grace period for companies like Network Solutions to register a domain without paying any fees.</p>
<p>I read something somewhere which claimed that there are companies which take advantage of the grace period by just re-registering a domain every five days, thereby avoiding ever having to pay fees on the domain, which I guess is so common it even has a name, &#8220;domain kiting&#8221;.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_kiting" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_kiting</a></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting</a> : &#8220;In January 2008, ICANN announced that the exemption on transaction costs (US$ 0.25) during the five-day grace period would be abandoned, which would effectively make the practice of domain tasting not viable.&#8221;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t found out yet if ICANN has actually implemented that yet, though.  If they haven&#8217;t already, I think they ought to just get rid of the grace period entirely &#8211; I think it would probably solve a lot of problems.</p>
<p>If that meant domain registration companies like Network Solutions could no longer accept credit cards due to the risk of credit card fraud, I don&#8217;t really see a problem with that &#8211; it might help make the credit card companies take responsibility for their own rampant problems with fraud.  There are other ways besides credit cards to instantaneously take payments over the internet &#8211; PayPal, for one.</p>
<p>I say, let the credit card companies suffer the consequences of their own incompetence &#8211; maybe then they&#8217;ll be motivated to improve themselves to better serve their customers, such as by implementing more effective anti-fraud measures.</p>
<p>I enjoy your blog. <img src='http://www.lightningshock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Apollia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.897 seconds -->
